BREAKING: Sesko fires Man. United past Everton in tense Premier League clash

Follow Us: Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube
LATEST SCORES:
Loading live scores...
News

Respite For Fani-Kayode As Judge Withdraws From Fraud Case

Femi Fani-Kayode

Quick Read

Respite came the way of former Minister of Aviation on Thursday as the judge presiding over his alleged N4.9 billion fraud case filed against him by the EFCC withdrew from the matter.

Femi Fani-Kayode

Akin Kuponiyi

Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, former Minister of Aviation and Senator Nenadi Usman, former Minister of Finance On Thursday succeeded in making the presiding judge, Justice Muslim Sule Hassan, to withdraw from trying them.

The trial judge had earlier dismissed the application filed by Fani-Kayode, calling for his withdrawal from the trial on the allegation that the judge will be biased against him.

Senator Usman, Fani-Kayode and a former National Chairman of the Association of Local Government of Nigeria (ALGON), and ex-Chairman of Kagarko Local Government Area of Kaduna State, Yusuf Danjuma and a company, Jointrust Dimentions Nigeria Limited, were arraigned before the court by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), on a 17-count charge of laundering about N4.6 billion.

Fani-Kayode had challenged the court’s jurisdiction on the ground that the trial judge who was formerly a Senior Counsel in the employment of EFCC, once prepared a charge marked FHC/L/523c/2008, on which he was tried before Justice Ngosi Ofili-Ajumogobia, but was acquitted and discharged in 2015.

Fani-kayode also contended that the offences in which he was charged were allegedly committed in Abuja, and that both his residence and businesses, and some of the witnesses he intend to call are in Abuja. Moreover, since other defendants in the case have filed an application for their case to be heard at Abuja.

However, Justice Hassan Sule, in his ruling stated that Fani-Kayode failed to establish the allegation that he will be biased in trying him.

He said though he prepared the charge that Fani-Kayode was tried with in 2008, but he never participated in the prosecution of the charge. The former minister was prosecuted by Mr. Festus Keyamo.

Justice Sule said: “it is not in dispute that I signed the charge, as the head of legal, but I never prosecuted or participated in the prosecution of the charge”

“The defendant/applicant has not shown proof of bias or likelihood of being biased in the case”.

He, however said he will exercise caution, by transferring the case file to the Chief Judge of the Court, for reassignment to another judge.

“The law is trite, in the light of all that I have said above, I am satisfied that the best is to refer the case file to the Chief Judge for reassignment to another judge”.

Both the prosecution and Defendants’ counsel commended the judge for the ruling.

At the last adjourned date, counsel representing the defendants: Mr. Norrisson Quakers, Mr Abiodun Owonikoko, and Mr S.I Ameh, all Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SAN), had all declined to cross-examine the EFCC prosecution witness Mr. Idowu Olusegun, a media consultant.

They urged the court to adjourn the suit to a date when all pending applications on jurisdiction will be heard and determined by the court, adding that it will serve the interest of justice to so do.

In counts one to seven of the charge, the accused were alleged to have unlawfully retained over N3.8 billion which they reasonably ought to have known formed part of the proceeds of an unlawful act of stealing and corruption.

In counts eight to 14, the accused were alleged to have unlawfully used over N970 million which they reasonably ought to have known formed part of an unlawful act of corruption while in counts 15 to17 Fani-Kayode and one Olubode Oke who is said to be at large, were alleged to have made cash payments of about N30 million, in excess of the amount allowed by law, without going through a financial institution.

Besides, Fani-Kayode was alleged to have made payments to one Paste Poster Co (PPC) of No 125 Lewis St., Lagos, in excess of amounts allowed by law.

All the offences alleged to have been committed by the accused persons were said to have contravened the provisions of sections 15 (3) (4), 16 (2) (b), and 16 (5) of the Money laundering (prohibition).

Comments

×