INEC has no justification for removing Mark’s name as ADC chair — Atiku
Quick Read
“We are accusing them [INEC] of misinterpreting the law, even though it is not their responsibility to do that. The court has already interpreted the law. We are also accusing them of bias,” he said.
Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar has stated that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has no justification for removing Sen. David Mark’s name as the National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC).
INEC had, on April 1, announced that it would no longer recognise Mark’s leadership of the party as well as the faction led by Nafiu Bala, following a Court of Appeal directive ordering parties to maintain the status quo ante bellum, with the situation before the suit was filed at the Federal High Court.
Speaking during an interview on BBC Newsday aired on Saturday which was monitored by Punch, Atiku said the electoral body acted outside its legal bounds by interpreting the appellate court’s interim ruling on the party’s internal affairs.
“We are accusing them [INEC] of misinterpreting the law, even though it is not their responsibility to do that. The court has already interpreted the law. We are also accusing them of bias,” he said.
When asked if the alleged bias was aimed at keeping President Bola Tinubu in power, Atiku responded, “For sure.”
The 2023 presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) argued that INEC’s actions contradict Supreme Court rulings which hold that internal party matters are beyond external interference.
“The commission has not acted according to law because we have a number of cases decided even by the Supreme Court that the internal affairs of political parties are not the prerogative of any agency other than the political parties themselves, but they have ignored the ruling of the highest court in the land,” he said.
Atiku maintained that INEC had no justification for removing the names of Mark-led ADC executives from its website, describing the move as a threat to Nigeria’s democratic progress and a sign of creeping authoritarianism.
“We [call it] dictatorship because we have seen evidence of government interference in the electoral process, even in the judicial process in the country,” Atiku said.
Comments